THE SOURCE-FREE SERIES RLC CIRCUIT
An understanding of the natural response of the series RLC circuit is a necessary background for future studies in filter design and communications networks.
Consider the series RLC circuit shown in
Figure 2. The circuit is being excited by the energy initially stored in the capacitor and inductor. The energy is represented by the initial capacitor voltage V0 and initial inductor current I0. Thus, at t = 0,
v
(
0
)
=
1
C
∫
−
∞
0
idt
=
V
0
v
(
0
)
=
1
C
∫
−
∞
0
idt
=
V
0
size 12{v \( 0 \) = { {1} over {C} } Int cSub { size 8{ - infinity } } cSup { size 8{0} } { ital "idt"} =V rSub { size 8{0} } } {}
(1)
i
(
0
)
=
I
0
i
(
0
)
=
I
0
size 12{i \( 0 \) =I rSub { size 8{0} } } {}
(2)
Applying KVL around the loop in
Figure 1,
Ri
+
L
di
dt
+
1
C
∫
−
∞
t
idt
=
0
Ri
+
L
di
dt
+
1
C
∫
−
∞
t
idt
=
0
size 12{ ital "Ri"+L { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } + { {1} over {C} } Int cSub { size 8{ - infinity } } cSup { size 8{t} } { ital "idt"} =0} {}
(3)
To eliminate the integral, we differentiate with respect to t and rearrange terms. We get
d
2
i
dt
2
+
R
L
di
dt
+
i
LC
=
0
d
2
i
dt
2
+
R
L
di
dt
+
i
LC
=
0
size 12{ { {d rSup { size 8{2} } i} over { ital "dt" rSup { size 8{2} } } } + { {R} over {L} } { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } + { {i} over { ital "LC"} } =0} {}
(4)
This is a
second-order differential equation and is the reason for calling the RLC circuits in this chapter second-order circuits. Our goal is to solve
Equation 4. To solve such a second-order differential equation requires that we have two initial conditions, such as the initial value of i and its first derivative or initial values of some i and v. The initial value of i is given in
Equation 2. We get the initial value of the derivative of I from
Equation 1 and
Equation 3; that is,
Ri
(
0
)
+
L
di
(
0
)
dt
+
V
0
=
0
Ri
(
0
)
+
L
di
(
0
)
dt
+
V
0
=
0
size 12{ ital "Ri" \( 0 \) +L { { ital "di" \( 0 \) } over { ital "dt"} } +V rSub { size 8{0} } =0} {}
Or
di
(
0
)
dt
=
−
1
L
(
RI
0
+
V
0
)
di
(
0
)
dt
=
−
1
L
(
RI
0
+
V
0
)
size 12{ { { ital "di" \( 0 \) } over { ital "dt"} } = - { {1} over {L} } \( ital "RI" rSub { size 8{0} } +V rSub { size 8{0} } \) } {}
(5)
with the two initial conditions in
Equation 2 and
Equation 5, we can now solve
Equation 4. Our experience in the preceding chapter on first-order circuits suggests that the solution is of exponential form. So we let
i
=
Ae
st
i
=
Ae
st
size 12{i= ital "Ae" rSup { size 8{ ital "st"} } } {}
(6)
where A and s are constants to be determined. Substituting
Equation 7 into
Equation 5 and carrying out the necessary differentiations, we obtain
As
2
e
st
+
AR
L
se
st
+
A
LC
e
st
=
0
As
2
e
st
+
AR
L
se
st
+
A
LC
e
st
=
0
size 12{ ital "As" rSup { size 8{2} } e rSup { size 8{ ital "st"} } + { { ital "AR"} over {L} } ital "se" rSup { size 8{ ital "st"} } + { {A} over { ital "LC"} } e rSup { size 8{ ital "st"} } =0} {}
Or
Ae
st
(
s
2
+
R
L
s
+
1
LC
)
=
0
Ae
st
(
s
2
+
R
L
s
+
1
LC
)
=
0
size 12{ ital "Ae" rSup { size 8{ ital "st"} } \( s rSup { size 8{2} } + { {R} over {L} } s+ { {1} over { ital "LC"} } \) =0} {}
(7)
Since
i=Aesti=Aest size 12{i= ital "Ae" rSup { size 8{ ital "st"} } } {} is assumed solution we are trying to find, only the expression in parentheses can be zero:
s
2
+
R
L
s
+
1
LC
=
0
s
2
+
R
L
s
+
1
LC
=
0
size 12{s rSup { size 8{2} } + { {R} over {L} } s+ { {1} over { ital "LC"} } =0} {}
(8)
This quadratic equation is known as the characteristic equation of the differential
Equation 4, since the roots of the equation dictate the character of i. The two roots of
Equation 8 are
s
1
=
−
R
2L
+
(
R
2L
)
2
−
1
LC
s
1
=
−
R
2L
+
(
R
2L
)
2
−
1
LC
size 12{s rSub { size 8{1} } = - { {R} over {2L} } + sqrt { \( { {R} over {2L} } \) rSup { size 8{2} } - { {1} over { ital "LC"} } } } {}
(9)
s
2
=
−
R
2L
−
(
R
2L
)
2
−
1
LC
s
2
=
−
R
2L
−
(
R
2L
)
2
−
1
LC
size 12{s rSub { size 8{2} } = - { {R} over {2L} } - sqrt { \( { {R} over {2L} } \) rSup { size 8{2} } - { {1} over { ital "LC"} } } } {}
(10)
A more compact way of expressing the roots is
s
1
=
−
α
+
α
2
−
ω
0
2
,
s
2
=
−
α
−
α
2
−
ω
0
2
s
1
=
−
α
+
α
2
−
ω
0
2
,
s
2
=
−
α
−
α
2
−
ω
0
2
size 12{s rSub { size 8{1} } = - α+ sqrt {α rSup { size 8{2} } - ω rSub { size 8{0} } rSup { size 8{2} } } ,s rSub { size 8{2} } = - α - sqrt {α rSup { size 8{2} } - ω rSub { size 8{0} } rSup { size 8{2} } } } {}
(11)
Where
α
=
R
2L
,
ω
0
=
1
LC
α
=
R
2L
,
ω
0
=
1
LC
size 12{α= { {R} over {2L} } ,ω rSub { size 8{0} } = { {1} over { sqrt { ital "LC"} } } } {}
(12)
The roots s1 and s2 are called
natural frequencies, measured in nepers per second (Np/s), because they are associated with the natural response of the circuit; ω0 is known as the resonant frequency or strictly as the
undamped natural frequency or the damping factor, expressed in nepers per second. In terms of α and ω0,
Equation 8 can be written as
s
2
+
2αs
+
ω
0
2
=
0
s
2
+
2αs
+
ω
0
2
=
0
size 12{s rSup { size 8{2} } +2αs+ω rSub { size 8{0} } rSup { size 8{2} } =0} {}
(13)
The variables s and
ω0ω0 size 12{ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {} are important quantities we will be discussing throughout the rest of the text.
The two values of s in
Equation 11 indicate that there are two possible solutions for I, each of which is of the form of the assumed solution in
Equation 7; that is,
i
1
=
A
1
e
s
1
t
,
i
1
=
A
1
e
s
1
t
,
size 12{i rSub { size 8{1} } =A rSub { size 8{1} } e rSup { size 8{s rSub { size 6{1} } t} } ,} {}
(14)
and
i
2
=
A
2
e
s
2
t
i
2
=
A
2
e
s
2
t
size 12{i rSub { size 8{2} } =A"" lSub { size 8{2} } e rSup { size 8{s rSub { size 6{2} } t} } } {}
Since
Equation 4 is a linear equation, any linear combination of the two distinct solutions i1 and i2 is also a solution of
Equation 4. A complete or total solution of
Equation 4 would therefore require a linear combination of
i1i1 size 12{i rSub { size 8{1} } } {} and
i2i2 size 12{i rSub { size 8{2} } } {}. Thus, the natural response of the series RLC circuit is
i
(
t
)
=
A
1
e
s
1
t
+
A
2
e
s
2
t
i
(
t
)
=
A
1
e
s
1
t
+
A
2
e
s
2
t
size 12{i \( t \) =A rSub { size 8{1} } e rSup { size 8{s rSub { size 6{1} } t} } +A"" lSub {2} size 12{e rSup {s rSub { size 6{2} } t} }} {}
(15)
Where the constants A1 and A2 are determined from the initial values i(0) and di(0)/dt in
Equation 2 and
Equation 5.
From
Equation 11, we can infer that there are three types of solutions:
1. If
α>ω0α>ω0 size 12{α>ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {}, we have the overdamped case.
2. If
α=ω0α=ω0 size 12{α=ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {}, we have the critically damped case.
3. If
α<ω0α<ω0 size 12{α<ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {}, we have the underdamped case.
We will consider each of these cases separately.
Overdamped case (
α>ω0α>ω0 size 12{α>ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {})
From
Equation 9 and
Equation 11,
α>ω0α>ω0 size 12{α>ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {} implies
C>4L/R2C>4L/R2 size 12{C> {4L} slash {R rSup { size 8{2} } } } {}. When this happens, both roots
s1s1 size 12{s rSub { size 8{1} } } {} and
s2s2 size 12{s rSub { size 8{2} } } {} are negative and real. The response is
i
t
=
A
1
e
s
1
t
+
A
2
e
s
2
t
i
t
=
A
1
e
s
1
t
+
A
2
e
s
2
t
size 12{i left (t right )=A rSub { size 8{1} } e rSup { size 8{s rSub { size 6{1} } t} } +A rSub {2} size 12{e rSup {s rSub { size 6{2} } t} }} {}
(16)
which decays and approaches zero as t increases.
Figure 3(a) illustrates a typical overdamped response.
Critically damped case (
α=ω0α=ω0 size 12{α=ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {})
When
α=ω0α=ω0 size 12{α=ω rSub { size 8{0} } } {},
C=4L/R2C=4L/R2 size 12{C= {4L} slash {R rSup { size 8{2} } } } {} and
s
1
=
s
2
=
−
α
=
−
R
2L
s
1
=
s
2
=
−
α
=
−
R
2L
size 12{s rSub { size 8{1} } =s rSub { size 8{2} } = - α= - { {R} over {2L} } } {}
(17)
i
(
t
)
=
A
1
e
−
αt
+
A
2
e
−
αt
=
A
3
e
−
αt
i
(
t
)
=
A
1
e
−
αt
+
A
2
e
−
αt
=
A
3
e
−
αt
size 12{i \( t \) =A rSub { size 8{1} } e rSup { size 8{ - αt} } +A rSub { size 8{2} } e rSup { size 8{ - αt} } =A rSub { size 8{3} } e rSup { size 8{ - αt} } } {}
Where
A3=A1+A2A3=A1+A2 size 12{A rSub { size 8{3} } =A rSub { size 8{1} } +A rSub { size 8{2} } } {}. This cannot be the solution, because the two initial conditions cannot be satisfied with single constant. What then could be wrong? Our assumption of an exponential solution is incorrect for the special case of critical damping. Let us go back to
Equation 4. When
α=ω0=R/2Lα=ω0=R/2L size 12{α=ω rSub { size 8{0} } = {R} slash {2L} } {},
Equation 4 becomes
d
2
i
dt
2
+
2α
di
dt
+
α
2
i
=
0
d
2
i
dt
2
+
2α
di
dt
+
α
2
i
=
0
size 12{ { {d rSup { size 8{2} } i} over { ital "dt" rSup { size 8{2} } } } +2α { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } +α rSup { size 8{2} } i=0} {}
or
d
dt
(
di
dt
+
αi
)
+
α
(
di
dt
+
αi
)
=
0
d
dt
(
di
dt
+
αi
)
+
α
(
di
dt
+
αi
)
=
0
size 12{ { {d} over { ital "dt"} } \( { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } +αi \) +α \( { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } +αi \) =0} {}
(18)
If we let
f
=
(
di
dt
+
αi
)
f
=
(
di
dt
+
αi
)
size 12{f= \( { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } +αi \) } {}
(19)
df
dt
+
αf
=
0
df
dt
+
αf
=
0
size 12{ { { ital "df"} over { ital "dt"} } +αf=0} {}
which is a first-order differential equation with solution
f=A1e−αtf=A1e−αt size 12{f=A rSub { size 8{1} } e rSup { size 8{ - αt} } } {}, where
A1A1 size 12{A rSub { size 8{1} } } {} is a constant.
Equation 19 then becomes
e
αt
di
dt
+
e
αt
αi
=
A
1
e
αt
di
dt
+
e
αt
αi
=
A
1
size 12{e rSup { size 8{αt} } { { ital "di"} over { ital "dt"} } +e rSup { size 8{αt} } αi=A"" lSub { size 8{1} } } {}
or
e
αt
di
dt
+
e
αt
αi
=
A